We also noticed a few details when inserting hyperlinks into PDF.Īcrobat and Foxit have a two-step process to insert a link, while PDFelement only requires one step. By contrast, adding images in PDFelement and Acrobat is a very fast process. Nonetheless, during the evaluation, Foxit didn’t immediately show images or video and audio files that were inserted.Īt times, the dialog box to add these elements would not appear.

The other two applications currently don’t support it, although there’s a workaround for video files to be embedded as comments in PDFelement. The versions of the software were all the latest releases at the time the evaluations were conducted.įoxit does offer one unique feature here: the ability to add video and audio content. Seen from a user experience perspective, this article compares the features and usability of three key players in the market: Adobe Acrobat Pro DC, Wondershare PDFelement Pro, and Foxit PDF Business Edition.įor the sake of this evaluation, the tests were all run on the same Windows 7 Professional PC with a 100mpbs Internet connection. With that, the question “which is the better PDF tool to use?” has become an important one for software users. However, even though it still leads the pack in market share and technical specifications, it does not appeal to markets like China, where the culture and habits of consumers are vastly different from the rest of the world.Īrising from this need for localization of software, companies like Foxit and Wanxing Technology have released powerful PDF software that is more suitable to the habits of the local user base. In the past, Adobe’s plat at the top of the global PDF market was practically unshakable.

That’s because of its relatively smaller size (compared to Word and other document formats), consistent display attributes, and the fidelity of the information contained in a PDF. PDF has long been a favored file format for businesses, academia, and several other professional areas.

Foxit phantompdf vs adobe pro